MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes
Journal Article

Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients’ outcomes

2021
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
To report on rectal dosimetry and toxicity outcomes in men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without polyethylene glycol hydrogel (HS) or hyaluronic acid (HA) rectal spacer (RS) insertion. Seventy consecutive men treated with LDR-BT between December 2017 and July 2019 were included in this study, including twenty-eight (40%) men who had RS insertion according to the preference of referring urologist, compared to a group of forty-two men (60%) without RS. Descriptive statistics were used to compare RS safety, dosimetric effects on organs at risk (rectum and urethra), and gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities (GU) (assessed using the CTCAE v.4) between the two groups of patients. The median prostate-rectal separation with RS at mid prostate was 10 mm (IQR, 8-11.5 mm). The median follow-up was 23.5 months. There were no post-operative complications for RS insertion. There was significantly reduced rectal dosimetry in RS-group vs. non-RS group; the median RV was 0.0 cc (IQR, 0.0-0.0 cc) vs. 0.4 cc (IQR, 0.1-1.1 cc) ( < 0.001), respectively. The mean rectal D and D were 52.4% vs. 84.2% ( < 0.001) and 45.7% vs. 70.0% ( < 0.001) for RS and non-RS group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean urethral D , D , and D . There were significantly less grade 1 acute and late GI toxicities in RS-group when compared to non-RS group (0% vs. 24%, = 0.004 for acute GI toxicity; 4% vs. 33%, = 0.003 for late GI toxicity). There were no reported acute or late grade 2 or above GI toxicities. Insertion of RS in men treated with LDR-BT is safe and resulted in a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. The reduction in rectal dosimetry with RS insertion translates into significantly reduced acute and late GI toxicities.