Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Decreasing barriers to the utilization of cryopreserved sperm in male cancer survivors: an expert review and guide
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Decreasing barriers to the utilization of cryopreserved sperm in male cancer survivors: an expert review and guide
Do you wish to request the book?
Decreasing barriers to the utilization of cryopreserved sperm in male cancer survivors: an expert review and guide
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Decreasing barriers to the utilization of cryopreserved sperm in male cancer survivors: an expert review and guide
2025
Overview
Abstract
Background
Sperm cryopreservation offers male cancer patients a critical opportunity to preserve fertility prior to gonadotoxic therapy, yet utilization of banked sperm remains modest, typically under 10%. A structured understanding of barriers across the cancer survivorship continuum is needed to support patients in utilization of cryopreserved sperm in alignment with their reproductive goals.
Materials and Methods
This expert review synthesizes current evidence and clinical experience to explore the multifaceted barriers to cryopreserved sperm use and propose specific solutions. Key intervention timepoints are examined, including the post-treatment fertility return visit, long-term cryopreservation while remote from family building, readiness for family building, and posthumous considerations. We subsequently outline an optimal Oncofertility Patient Care Pathway.
Results
Multiple clinical, psychosocial, and financial obstacles limit the transition from sperm banking to use. Approximately one-third of survivors do not attend post-treatment fertility return visits, reducing opportunities for counseling and longitudinal reproductive planning. Psychological factors—including fear of cancer recurrence and delayed readiness for family building—contribute to prolonged storage. Many patients remain underinformed about the efficacy and processes of assisted reproductive techniques, while financial concerns are significant. These intersecting barriers hinder use of cryopreserved sperm. Opportunities exist to intervene at key timepoints, as outlined in the Oncofertillity Patient Care Pathway.
Conclusion
A multidisciplinary and structured oncofertility pathway, such as detailed in this review, is needed to support cancer survivors in achieving their reproductive goals. Enhanced counseling, technology-enabled follow-up systems, targeted psychological support, and policies promoting broader insurance coverage for assisted reproduction represent key strategies to overcome existing barriers.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
