Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Impact Joining of Pure Copper C1100 and Aluminum Alloy A6061-T6 Plates at Edges
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Impact Joining of Pure Copper C1100 and Aluminum Alloy A6061-T6 Plates at Edges
Do you wish to request the book?
Impact Joining of Pure Copper C1100 and Aluminum Alloy A6061-T6 Plates at Edges
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Impact Joining of Pure Copper C1100 and Aluminum Alloy A6061-T6 Plates at Edges
2022
Overview
Joining of pure copper C1100 and aluminum alloy A6061-T6 plates of 5 mm thickness was investigated. The method was developed by one of the authors, in which the newly created surfaces of a pair of plates obtained by high-speed shear were immediately in contact with a sliding motion with a small overlap length. The total processing time was just about a few milliseconds. To create the new surface, high-speed shaving was also tested. The joining was not possible for the full thickness of the plates. A sharp notch was observed at the joint boundary due to a large shear droop in the copper. Shaving decreased the shear droop, and the joint length through the plate thickness became longer. The joining performance was evaluated by a uniaxial tensile test. The joint efficiency reached 100% using the specimen cut out from the really joined boundary. The affected zone of joining was confirmed by the hardness distribution near the boundary. It was about 30% of the thickness of the plate, which was much smaller than that in welding by heat, and no softened zone was found in both materials.
