Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Gorse GJ, et al. “Immunogenicity and tolerance of ascending doses of a recombinant protective antigen (rPA102) anthrax vaccine: A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter trial” Vaccine 24 (2006) 5950–5959
by
Zink, Thomas K.
in
Allergy and Immunology
/ Anthrax
/ Anthrax Vaccines - administration & dosage
/ Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects
/ Anthrax Vaccines - immunology
/ Biothrax
/ Humans
/ Immune response
/ Immunogenicity
/ Licenses
/ Medical research
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Reactogenicity
/ Recombinant protective antigen
/ Research Design
/ Safety
/ Vaccine
/ Vaccines
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - administration & dosage
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - adverse effects
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - immunology
2007
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Gorse GJ, et al. “Immunogenicity and tolerance of ascending doses of a recombinant protective antigen (rPA102) anthrax vaccine: A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter trial” Vaccine 24 (2006) 5950–5959
by
Zink, Thomas K.
in
Allergy and Immunology
/ Anthrax
/ Anthrax Vaccines - administration & dosage
/ Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects
/ Anthrax Vaccines - immunology
/ Biothrax
/ Humans
/ Immune response
/ Immunogenicity
/ Licenses
/ Medical research
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Reactogenicity
/ Recombinant protective antigen
/ Research Design
/ Safety
/ Vaccine
/ Vaccines
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - administration & dosage
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - adverse effects
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - immunology
2007
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Gorse GJ, et al. “Immunogenicity and tolerance of ascending doses of a recombinant protective antigen (rPA102) anthrax vaccine: A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter trial” Vaccine 24 (2006) 5950–5959
by
Zink, Thomas K.
in
Allergy and Immunology
/ Anthrax
/ Anthrax Vaccines - administration & dosage
/ Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects
/ Anthrax Vaccines - immunology
/ Biothrax
/ Humans
/ Immune response
/ Immunogenicity
/ Licenses
/ Medical research
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Reactogenicity
/ Recombinant protective antigen
/ Research Design
/ Safety
/ Vaccine
/ Vaccines
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - administration & dosage
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - adverse effects
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - immunology
2007
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Gorse GJ, et al. “Immunogenicity and tolerance of ascending doses of a recombinant protective antigen (rPA102) anthrax vaccine: A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter trial” Vaccine 24 (2006) 5950–5959
Journal Article
Gorse GJ, et al. “Immunogenicity and tolerance of ascending doses of a recombinant protective antigen (rPA102) anthrax vaccine: A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter trial” Vaccine 24 (2006) 5950–5959
2007
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In the study reported by Gorse et al. a unique, educational opportunity was lost. The vaccine and biodefense communities almost experienced the rare chance in a Phase I study to scientifically compare head-to-head an early-stage, investigational recombinant anthrax vaccine (rPA102) with the safe, effective and already FDA-licensed anthrax vaccine, AVA (BioThrax
®). The authors take a stab at making safety and immunogenicity comparisons between the candidate vaccine and AVA (BioThrax
®) but the study design and analytical approach makes this inappropriate. Inaccurate and poorly substantiated editorial comments in the paper's introduction compound these methodological problems. The reader is presented with a series of false and misleading statements about AVA (BioThrax
®). Out-of-date sources are relied upon and these references are offered to the reader as the best evidence available when more current papers with up-to-date information and data exist. Additionally, the conclusions in several original contributions are misrepresented in this paper by Gorse et al. Issues with protocol and bias notwithstanding, the single most compelling observation from this trial could be that the response of those subjects in this study population (
n
=
19) who received AVA on the altered schedule and route of two doses of AVA (BioThrax
®) delivered intramuscularly (IM) in just 4 weeks mounted a robust immune response. Given the more than 30 year history of the safe and effective use of AVA (BioThrax
®) as well as the more current data on AVA (BioThrax
®) a strong case can be made for continued funding to investigate the feasibility of adding another route of delivery (IM) and optimizing the schedule for this already FDA-licensed vaccine.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Elsevier Limited
Subject
/ Anthrax
/ Anthrax Vaccines - administration & dosage
/ Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects
/ Anthrax Vaccines - immunology
/ Biothrax
/ Humans
/ Licenses
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Recombinant protective antigen
/ Safety
/ Vaccine
/ Vaccines
/ Vaccines, Synthetic - administration & dosage
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.