Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clustering and Characterization of the Lactation Curves of Dairy Cows Using K-Medoids Clustering Algorithm
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clustering and Characterization of the Lactation Curves of Dairy Cows Using K-Medoids Clustering Algorithm
Do you wish to request the book?
Clustering and Characterization of the Lactation Curves of Dairy Cows Using K-Medoids Clustering Algorithm
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Clustering and Characterization of the Lactation Curves of Dairy Cows Using K-Medoids Clustering Algorithm
2020
Overview
The aim of the study was to group the lactation curve (LC) of Holstein cows in several clusters based on their milking characteristics and to investigate physiological differences among the clusters. Milking data of 330 lactations which have a milk yield per day during entire lactation period were used. The data were obtained by refinement from 1332 lactations from 724 cows collected from commercial farms. Based on the similarity measures, clustering was performed using the k-medoids algorithm; the number of clusters was determined to be six, following the elbow method. Significant differences on parity, peak milk yield, DIM at peak milk yield, and average and total milk yield (p < 0.01) were observed among the clusters. Four clusters, which include 82% of data, show typical LC patterns. The other two clusters represent atypical patterns. Comparing to the LCs generated from the previous models, Wood, Wilmink and Dijsktra, it is observed that the prediction errors in the atypical patterns of the two clusters are much larger than those of the other four cases of typical patterns. The presented model can be used as a tool to refine characterization on the typical LC patterns, excluding atypical patterns as exceptional cases.
