Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach
by
Dukhanin Vadim
, Wu, Albert
, Dy Sydney
, Keller, San
, Wilson, Renee
, Snyder, Claire
in
Criteria
/ Data collection
/ Domains
/ Health care
/ Identification methods
/ Internal medicine
/ Measurement methods
/ Mixed methods research
/ Performance assessment
/ Performance evaluation
/ Performance measurement
/ Primary care
/ Well being
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach
by
Dukhanin Vadim
, Wu, Albert
, Dy Sydney
, Keller, San
, Wilson, Renee
, Snyder, Claire
in
Criteria
/ Data collection
/ Domains
/ Health care
/ Identification methods
/ Internal medicine
/ Measurement methods
/ Mixed methods research
/ Performance assessment
/ Performance evaluation
/ Performance measurement
/ Primary care
/ Well being
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach
by
Dukhanin Vadim
, Wu, Albert
, Dy Sydney
, Keller, San
, Wilson, Renee
, Snyder, Claire
in
Criteria
/ Data collection
/ Domains
/ Health care
/ Identification methods
/ Internal medicine
/ Measurement methods
/ Mixed methods research
/ Performance assessment
/ Performance evaluation
/ Performance measurement
/ Primary care
/ Well being
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach
Journal Article
Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
New models of primary care include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote patient-centered care. PROMs provide information on patient functional status and well-being, can be used to enhance care quality, and are proposed for use in assessing performance. Our objective was to identify a short list of candidate PROMs for use in primary care practice and to serve as a basis for performance measures (PMs). We used qualitative and quantitative methods to identify relevant patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains for use in performance measurement (PRO-PM) and their associated PROMs. We collected data from key informant groups: patients (n = 13; one-on-one and group interviews; concept saturation analysis), clinical thought leaders (n = 9; group discussions; thematic analysis), primary care practices representatives (n = 37; six focus groups; thematic analysis), and primary care payer representatives (n = 10; 12-question survey; frequencies of responses). We merged the key informant group information with findings from environmental literature scans. We conducted a targeted evidence review of measurement properties for candidate PROMs. We used a scoping review and key informant groups to identify PROM evaluation criteria, which were linked to the National Quality Forum measure evaluation criteria. We developed a de novo schema to score candidate PROMs against our criteria. We identified four PRO domains and 10 candidate PROMs: 3 for depressive symptoms, 2 for physical function, 3 for self-efficacy, 2 for ability to participate. Five PROMs met ≥ 70% of the evidence criteria for three PRO domains: PHQ-9 or PROMIS Depression (depression), PF-10 or PROMIS-PF (physical functioning), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Treatments and Medications (self-efficacy). The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities met 68% of our criteria and might be considered for inclusion. Existing evidence and key informant data identified 5 candidate PROMs to use in primary care. These instruments can be used to develop PRO-PMs.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.