Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
QUANTIFYING THE SOURCES OF FIRM HETEROGENEITY
by
Hottman, Colin J.
, Weinstein, David E.
, Redding, Stephen J.
in
Companies
/ Data quality
/ Markups
/ Monopolistic competition
/ Prices
/ Productivity
/ Sales
/ Studies
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
QUANTIFYING THE SOURCES OF FIRM HETEROGENEITY
by
Hottman, Colin J.
, Weinstein, David E.
, Redding, Stephen J.
in
Companies
/ Data quality
/ Markups
/ Monopolistic competition
/ Prices
/ Productivity
/ Sales
/ Studies
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
QUANTIFYING THE SOURCES OF FIRM HETEROGENEITY
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We develop and structurally estimate a model of heterogeneous multiproduct firms that can be used to decompose the firm-size distribution into the contributions of costs, “appeal” (quality or taste), markups, and product scope. Using Nielsen barcode data on prices and sales, we find that variation in firm appeal and product scope explains at least four fifths of the variation in firm sales. We show that the imperfect substitutability of products within firms, and the fact that larger firms supply more products than smaller firms, implies that standard productivity measures are highly dependent on implicit demand system assumptions and probably dramatically understate the relative productivity of the largest firms. Although most firms are well approximated by the monopolistic competition benchmark of constant markups, we find that the largest firms that account for most of aggregate sales depart substantially from this benchmark, and exhibit both variable markups and substantial cannibalization effects.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.