Journal Article

A Modified Arthroscopic Triple‐row Repair Technique for L‐shaped Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

Fang, Yushun, Zhang, Qingsong, Zhang, Shaohua, Xiong, Jun

2024

Overview

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of a modified arthroscopic triple‐row (TR) repair technique with the suture bridge (SB) repair technique in treating L‐shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears. Various surgical techniques for L‐shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears have been reported, many of which aid in increasing the contact area and pressure of the rotator cuff. However, there is still debate over which technique yields superior results. Methods From January 2017 to March 2020, 61 cases of L‐shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears were included in this study. Of these, 34 cases underwent the modified arthroscopic triple‐row repair technique, while 27 cases were addressed with the suture bridge repair technique. Functional assessment was conducted using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, the Constant score (CS), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) assessments for rotator cuff healing were performed at the 24‐month postoperative mark. Statistical evaluations were conducted using SPSS for Windows (Version 25.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), employing the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test to compare preoperative and postoperative data and ROM differences, and the Mann–Whitney U test for statistical differences in clinical outcome scores between the two groups. A p‐value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Comparative analysis of the preoperative and final follow‐up scores revealed a substantial enhancement in shoulder function, as indicated by the ASES, UCLA, CS, and VAS scores, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). At both the preoperative stage and final follow‐up, no notable differences were observed in ASES, UCLA, CS, and VAS scores between the two groups. However, the TR repair group exhibited lower VAS scores than the SB group at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Active range of motion (ROM) showed significant improvement in both groups. No significant differences in ROM were noted between the two groups either before the surgery or at the final follow‐up. Conclusion The study demonstrates that both the modified arthroscopic TR and SB techniques for L‐shaped delaminated cuff tears yield satisfactory outcomes, with no significant differences in overall clinical performance. Notably, early postoperative pain management appears more effective with the modified TR technique, suggesting its potential for enhanced early recovery experiences. This technique's design, promoting securer fixation and optimal contact conditions, is implied to facilitate superior long‐term healing, warranting further investigation into its long‐term benefits. The study compared the modified arthroscopic triple‐row repair technique and suture bridge repair technique for L‐shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears, finding both methods yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes with no significant difference; however, the modified triple‐row technique offered better pain relief in the early postoperative period and potentially superior long‐term healing benefits. The schematic illustration represents the modified arthroscopic triple‐row repair technique.

• Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd,John Wiley & Sons, Inc,Wiley
• Subject: Arthroscopy / Clinical / Clinical outcomes / Contraindications / Debridement / Delaminated rotator cuff tears / En masse repair / L‐shaped / Magnetic resonance imaging / Medical diagnosis / Rotator cuff / Separate repair / Surgical techniques / Sutures / Triple‐row