MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism
Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism
Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism
Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism
Journal Article

Influence of device-assisted suction against resistance (Mueller maneuver) on image quality in CTPA for suspected lung embolism

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objectives To investigate the effect of a device-assisted suction against resistance Mueller maneuver (MM) on transient interruption of contrast (TIC) in the aorta and pulmonary trunk (PT) on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). Methods In this prospective single-center study, 150 patients with suspected pulmonary artery embolism were assigned randomly with two different breathing maneuvers (Mueller maneuver (MM) or standard end-inspiratory breath-hold command (SBC)) during routine CTPA. The MM was performed using a patented prototype (Contrast Booster™) which allows both the patient by means of visual feedback and the medical staff in the CT scanning room to monitor whether the patient is sucking sufficiently or not. Mean Hounsfield attenuation in descending aorta and PT was measured and compared. Results Overall, patients with MM showed an attenuation of 338.24 HU in the pulmonary trunk, compared to 313.71 HU in SBC ( p  = 0.157). In the aorta, the values for MM were lower compared to SBC (134.42 HU vs. 177.83 HU, p  = 0.001). The TP-aortic ratio was significantly higher in the MM group at 3.86 compared to the SBC group at 2.26, p  = 0.001. TIC phenomenon was absent in the MM group, whereas it was present in 9 patients (12.3%) in the SBC group ( p  = 0.005). Overall contrast was better on all levels for MM ( p  < 0.001). The presence of breathing artifacts was higher in the MM group (48.1% vs. 30.1%, p  = 0.038), without clinical consequence. Conclusions Performing the MM with the application of the prototype is an effective way of preventing the TIC phenomenon during i.v. contrast-enhanced CTPA scanning compared to the standard end-inspiratory breathing command. Clinical relevance Compared to standard end-inspiratory breathing command, the device-assisted Mueller maneuver (MM) improves contrast enhancement and prevents the transient interruption of contrast (TIC) phenomenon in CTPA. Therefore, it may offer optimized diagnostic workup and timely treatment for patients with pulmonary embolism. Key Points • Transient interruption of contrast (TIC) may impair image quality in CTPA. • Mueller Maneuver using a device prototype could lower the rate of TIC. • Device application in clinical routine may increase diagnostic accuracy.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks