MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
Journal Article

Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model

2021
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background The introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI‐guided biopsy has improved the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, it remains uncertain whether it is cost‐effective, especially in a population‐based screening strategy. Methods We used a micro‐simulation model to assess the cost‐effectiveness of an MRI‐based prostate cancer screening in comparison to the classical prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening, at a population level. The test sensitivity parameters for the mpMRI and MRI‐guided biopsy, grade misclassification rates, utility estimates, and the unit costs of different interventions were obtained from literature. We assumed the same screening attendance rate and biopsy compliance rate for both strategies. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis, consisting of 1000 model runs, was performed to estimate a mean incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) and assess uncertainty. A €20,000 willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and a discounting rate of 3.5% was considered in the analysis. Results The MRI‐based screening improved the life‐years (LY) and QALYs gained by 3.5 and 3, respectively, in comparison to the classical screening pathway. Based on the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the MRI screening pathway leads to total discounted mean incremental costs of €15,413 (95% confidence interval (CI) of €14,556–€16,272) compared to the classical screening pathway. The corresponding discounted mean incremental QALYs gained was 1.36 (95% CI of 1.31–1.40), resulting in a mean ICER of €11,355 per QALY gained. At a WTP threshold of €20,000, the MRI screening pathway has about 84% chance to be more cost‐effective than the classical screening pathway. Conclusions For triennial screening from age 55–64, incorporation of mpMRI as a reflex test after a positive PSA test result with a subsequent MRI‐guided biopsy has a high probability to be more cost‐effective as compared with the classical prostate cancer screening pathway. Incorporation of mpMRI as a triage test before biopsy followed by MRI‐guided biopsy improved the life‐years (LY) and QALYs gained, and has a high probability to be more cost‐effective as compared with the regular prostate cancer screening pathway.