Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluating Bicycle Path Roughness: A Comparative Study Using Smartphone and Smart Bicycle Light Sensors
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluating Bicycle Path Roughness: A Comparative Study Using Smartphone and Smart Bicycle Light Sensors
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluating Bicycle Path Roughness: A Comparative Study Using Smartphone and Smart Bicycle Light Sensors
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evaluating Bicycle Path Roughness: A Comparative Study Using Smartphone and Smart Bicycle Light Sensors
2024
Overview
The quality of bicycle path surfaces significantly influences the comfort of cyclists. This study evaluates the effectiveness of smartphone sensor data and smart bicycle lights data in assessing the roughness of bicycle paths. The research was conducted in Hasselt, Belgium, where various bicycle path pavement types, such as asphalt, cobblestone, concrete, and paving tiles, were analyzed across selected streets. A smartphone application (Physics Toolbox Sensor Suite) and SEE.SENSE smart bicycle lights were used to collect GPS and vertical acceleration data on the bicycle paths. The Dynamic Comfort Index (DCI) and Root Mean Square (RMS) values from the data collected through the Physics Toolbox Sensor Suite were calculated to quantify the vibrational comfort experienced by cyclists. In addition, the data collected from the SEE.SENSE smart bicycle light, DCI, and RMS computed results were categorized for a statistical comparison. The findings of the statistical tests revealed no significant difference in the comfort assessment among DCI, RMS, and SEE.SENSE. The study highlights the potential of integrating smartphone sensors and smart bicycle lights for efficient, large-scale assessments of bicycle infrastructure, contributing to more informed urban planning and improved cycling conditions. It also provides a low-cost solution for the city authorities to continuously assess and monitor the quality of their cycling paths.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
