Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Preclinical and Clinical Amelioration of Bone Fractures with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Preclinical and Clinical Amelioration of Bone Fractures with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Preclinical and Clinical Amelioration of Bone Fractures with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Preclinical and Clinical Amelioration of Bone Fractures with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2022
Overview
Even though reunion of bone fracture confronts clinicians, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are investigated to be curative in bone fracture. This study aimed to explore the application potential of MSCs for healing bone fractures. By inputting search terms and retrieving studies published up to March 2021, multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify eligible studies. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to analyze the main results in the meta-analysis. Data analysis was performed using Engauge Digitizer 10.8 and R Software. Of the 31 articles, 26 were preclinical studies (n = 913), and 5 were clinical trials (n = 335). Preclinically, MSCs therapy significantly augmented the progress of bone regeneration [(bone volume over tissue volume (MD7.35, p < 0.01)], despite some non-significant effects (on the callus index, bone strength, work to failure, and stiffness). Clinically, the MSC group had a significantly reduced incidence of poor recovery (odds ratio (OR) 0.30, p < 0.01); however, a significant decrease in healing time was not observed in the MSC group (MD 2.47, p = 0.26). In summary, our data suggest that patients with bone fractures benefited from MSC administration and that MSCs are a potentially useful agent for bone regeneration. Despite these satisfactory outcomes, larger randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are necessary to confirm these findings.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
Subject
