Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
Do you wish to request the book?
Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
2022
Overview
Introduction
Telemedicine is being used in an increasing number of healthy lifestyle intervention studies in preventive cardiology. However, the optimal telemedicine-based approach for patients with cardiovascular disease remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to identify which design features are associated with the acceptance and efficacy of telemedicine in this specific patient population.
Methods
The databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched from 5 October 2010 to 5 October 2020. This systematic review only included randomized controlled or quasi-randomized controlled trials with a comparator to a telemedicine-based intervention group and a designated measure of adherence. We adopted a narrative synthesis approach to define telemedical design features, which were clustered into three main categories (social, exercise related and barrier removal) and compared to adherence (graded as good, medium and bad) and primary outcomes (significant improvement, no significant change).
Results
We screened a total of 865 records, of which 14 were included in this review, containing 13 identified design features. In 8 studies (57.1%), adherence was graded as good (4 studies medium, 2 studies bad). A positive primary outcome occurred in 10 (71.4%) studies. Personal contact showed the most pronounced (while not statistically significant) positive association with adherence and study outcomes.
Conclusion
Given the remote nature of telemedical lifestyle intervention studies, including recurring personal contact in the intervention seems to be a key factor in ensuring that adherence levels remain comparable to those seen in centre-based interventions.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
Subject
