Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Neural Network Models for Ionospheric Electron Density Prediction at a Fixed Altitude Using Neural Architecture Search
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Neural Network Models for Ionospheric Electron Density Prediction at a Fixed Altitude Using Neural Architecture Search
Do you wish to request the book?
Neural Network Models for Ionospheric Electron Density Prediction at a Fixed Altitude Using Neural Architecture Search
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Neural Network Models for Ionospheric Electron Density Prediction at a Fixed Altitude Using Neural Architecture Search
2024
Overview
Specification and forecast of ionospheric parameters, such as ionospheric electron density (Ne), have been an important topic in space weather and ionospheric research. Neural networks (NNs) emerge as a powerful modeling tool for Ne prediction. However, heavy manual adjustments are time consuming to determine the optimal NN structures. In this work, we propose to use neural architecture search (NAS), an automatic machine learning method, to mitigate this problem. NAS aims to find the optimal network structure through the alternate optimization of the hyperparameters and the corresponding network parameters within a pre‐defined hyperparameter search space. A total of 16‐year data from Millstone Hill incoherent scatter radar (ISR) are used for the NN models. One single‐layer NN (SLNN) model and one deep NN (DNN) model are both trained with NAS, namely SLNN‐NAS and DNN‐NAS, for Ne prediction and compared with their manually tuned counterparts (SLNN and DNN) based on previous studies. Our results show that SLNN‐NAS and DNN‐NAS outperformed SLNN and DNN, respectively. These NN predictions of Ne daily variation patterns reveal a 27‐day mid‐latitude topside Ne variation, which cannot be reasonably represented by traditional empirical models developed using monthly averages. DNN‐NAS yields the best prediction accuracy measured by quantitative metrics and rankings of daily pattern prediction, especially with an improvement in mean absolute error more than 10% compared to the SLNN model. The limited improvement of NAS is likely due to the network complexity and the limitation of fully connected NN without the time histories of input parameters.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subject
