MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Journal Article

Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2019
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundOur previous studies have shown the diagnostic utility of a newly developed dual-focus endoscope with narrow-band imaging (DF-NBI) and simplified dyad criteria for detection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). This clinical trial aimed to study the diagnostic efficacy of DF-NBI with dyad criteria for detecting SESCC compared to white light imaging (WLI).MethodsThis was a single-arm prospective comparative trial. We enrolled 170 consecutive high-risk patients for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients were initially examined with WLI by one independent endoscopist and then the other performed DF-NBI blinded to the WLI diagnosis to avoid a carry-over effect. Lesions showing proliferation and/or various shapes of intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCL) under DF-NBI (i.e., dyad criteria) were endoscopically diagnosed as SESCC including high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. The primary endpoint was sensitivity of WLI and DF-NBI for detecting SESCC. The secondary endpoints were the diagnostic performance (i.e., specificity and accuracy) and inter/intra-observer concordance of DF-NBI with dyad criteria.ResultsA total 77 SESCCs were detected. The sensitivity of DF-NBI for SESCC was significantly higher than that of WLI (91% vs. 51%, P < 0.001). The specificity and accuracy of WLI and DF-NBI using dyad criteria were 100% vs. 84%, and 86% vs. 86%, respectively. Various shapes and proliferation of IPCL showed the highest value in inter-observer and intra-observer agreements (κ = 0.77 and 0.82, respectively).ConclusionDF-NBI combined with dyad criteria may be a promising technique with a high sensitivity for diagnosis of SESCC and high inter/intra-observer agreement.