Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Readability of Patient Education Materials Available at the Point of Care
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Readability of Patient Education Materials Available at the Point of Care
Do you wish to request the book?
Readability of Patient Education Materials Available at the Point of Care
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Readability of Patient Education Materials Available at the Point of Care
2012
Overview
Background
Many patient education materials (PEMs) available on the internet are written at high school or college reading levels, rendering them inaccessible to the average US resident, who reads at or below an 8
th
grade level. Currently, electronic health record (EHR) providers partner with companies that produce PEMs, allowing clinicians to access PEMs at the point of care.
Objective
To assess the readability of PEMs provided by a popular EHR vendor as well as the National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Design
We included PEMs from Micromedex, EBSCO, and MedlinePlus. Micromedex and EBSCO supply PEMs to Meditech, a popular EHR supplier in the US. MedlinePlus supplies the NLM. These PEM databases have high market penetration and accessibility.
Measurements
Grade reading level of the PEMs was calculated using three validated indices: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Gunning Fog (GFI), and Flesch–Kincaid (FKI). The percentage of documents above target readability and average readability scores from each database were calculated.
Results
We randomly sampled 100 disease-matched PEMs from three databases (n = 300 PEMs). Depending on the readability index used, 30-100% of PEMs were written above the 8
th
grade level. The average reading level for MedlinePlus, EBSCO, and Micromedex PEMs was 10.2 (1.9), 9.7 (1.3), and 8.6 (0.9), respectively (p ≤ 0.000) as estimated by the GFI. Estimates of readability using SMOG and FKI were similar.
Conclusions
The majority of PEMS available through the NLM and a popular EHR were written at reading levels considerably higher than that of the average US adult.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
