Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm in chronic kidney disease patients: propensity score-matched case–control analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm in chronic kidney disease patients: propensity score-matched case–control analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm in chronic kidney disease patients: propensity score-matched case–control analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm in chronic kidney disease patients: propensity score-matched case–control analysis
2019
Overview
BackgroundLittle is known about the outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We compared the efficacy and safety of ESD between CKD and non-CKD patients.MethodsFrom January 2005 to December 2014, 102 CKD patients underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms at a tertiary medical institution were reviewed retrospectively. A propensity score-matched control group (102 patients) was selected from non-CKD patients to compare clinical outcomes between CKD and non-CKD patients.ResultsEn bloc resection (96.1%) and curative resection (88.2%) rates in the CKD group did not significantly differ from those in the non-CKD group. Median procedure times (25.0 vs. 21.5 min, p = 0.734) and perforation risk (p = 0.480) were similar between groups. The CKD group showed a tendency towards more bleeding events (p = 0.052) and had a significantly longer hospital stay (p = 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, stage 3 CKD patients exhibited a bleeding risk comparable to that exhibited by non-CKD patients (HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.36–5.06; p = 0.654), whereas stage 4 (HR 5.79; 95% CI 1.52–22.0; p = 0.010) and stage 5 (HR 4.80; 95% CI 1.58–14.6; p = 0.006) patients showed higher bleeding risks than non-CKD patients. In a multivariate analysis, stage 4/5 CKD was a significant predictor for bleeding risk (HR 4.99; 95% CI 1.32–18.8; p = 0.018).ConclusionsESD for gastric epithelial neoplasms can be performed in stage 3 CKD patients with comparable efficacy and safety to that performed in non-CKD patients. Stage 4 and 5 CKD patients should be closely monitored for bleeding events after ESD.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.