Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
MRI patterns of thigh muscle involvement in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and dermatomyositis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
MRI patterns of thigh muscle involvement in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and dermatomyositis
Do you wish to request the book?
MRI patterns of thigh muscle involvement in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and dermatomyositis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
MRI patterns of thigh muscle involvement in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and dermatomyositis
2025
Overview
Background
Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are characterized by weakness, hyperCKemia, associated autoantibodies, and varying extramuscular manifestations. Muscle MRI, currently subordinate to histopathology and serology in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) classification, has an evolving role. Our study aims to define thigh muscle MRI involvement in IMNM and DM by direct comparison.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included 25 participants, who met IIM classification criteria (14 IMNM, 11 DM) and had available thigh MRI. Clinical and paraclinical data were available and reviewed. 11 muscles were graded for edema on MRI using a semi-quantitative scale (0: normal, 1: <30% of muscle involvement, 2: 31–75%, 3: > 75%). For 3 participants with no significant muscle edema, muscle fatty infiltration was scored according to the same scale. Using linear mixed-effects models, muscle scores were compared between the two groups and a secondary analysis was performed of only edema scores, excluding the 3 participants with fatty infiltration scores.
Results
The most affected muscles in IMNM were the semimembranosus (3.0 [2.7-3.0] {median [IQR]}), biceps femoris-long head (BF-LH) (2.7 [2.0–3.0]), and adductors (2.5 [2.0–3.0]). In DM, the most affected muscles were the vastus lateralis (2.7 [2.3-3.0]), vastus intermedius (2.9 [2.2-3.0]), vastus medialis (2.3 [1.7–2.7]), semitendinosus (2.2 [1.0-2.7]), rectus femoris (RF) (2.0 [1.0-2.8]), biceps femoris-short head (BF-SH) (1.9 [1.0-2.7]), gracilis, and sartorius. Intergroup statistical difference of scores was significant (
p
< 0.01) for 10/11 thigh muscles excluding the RF (
p
= 0.19), supporting an inverse relationship of muscle involvement for DM and IMNM. The secondary comparative analysis of only muscle edema scores was significant (
p
< 0.05) for the same 10/11 muscles with a consistent direction for all comparisons.
Conclusion
DM and IMNM affect disparate thigh muscles on MRI. DM preferentially affects the anterior thigh, semitendinosus and BF-SH in the posterior thigh, and gracilis in the medial thigh, whereas IMNM preferentially affects the posterior thigh (semimembranosus and BF-LH) and adductors in the medial thigh.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BMC
