MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
Journal Article

Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications

2017
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the long-term endocrine outcomes and postoperative complications following endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal resection (TSR) for the treatment of acromegaly. Methods A literature review was performed, and studies with at least five patients who underwent TSR for acromegaly, reporting biochemical remission criteria and long-term remission outcomes were included. Data extracted from each study included surgical technique, perioperative complications, biochemical remission criteria, and long-term remission outcomes. Results Fifty-two case series from 1976 to 2016 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4375 patients. Thirty-six reports were microsurgical ( n  = 3144) and 13 were endoscopic ( n  = 940). Three studies compared microsurgical ( n  = 111) to endoscopic TSR outcomes ( n  = 180). The overall initial and long-term remission rates were 58.2 vs. 57.4% and 69.2 vs. 70.2% for the microsurgical and endoscopic groups, respectively. For microadenomas, the initial and long-term remission rates were 77.6 vs. 82.2% and 76.9 vs. 73.5% for microsurgical and endoscopic approaches, respectively. For macroadenomas, the initial and long-term remission rates were 46.9 vs. 60.0% and 40.2 vs. 61.5% for microsurgical and endoscopic approaches, respectively. The rates of postoperative CSF leak were 3.0 vs. 2.3% for the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. The rates of hypopituitarism and transient diabetes insipidus were 6.7 vs. 6.4% and 9.0 vs. 7.8% for the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Conclusions Both endoscopic and microsurgical approaches for TSR of growth hormone-secreting adenomas are viable treatment options for patients with acromegaly, and yield similarly high rates of remission under the most current consensus criteria.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks