Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Persistence of soil organic matter in eroding versus depositional landform positions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Persistence of soil organic matter in eroding versus depositional landform positions
Do you wish to request the book?
Persistence of soil organic matter in eroding versus depositional landform positions
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Persistence of soil organic matter in eroding versus depositional landform positions
2012
Overview
Soil organic matter (SOM) processes in dynamic landscapes are strongly influenced by soil erosion and sedimentation. We determined the contribution of physical isolation of organic matter (OM) inside aggregates, chemical interaction of OM with soil minerals, and molecular structure of SOM in controlling storage and persistence of SOM in different types of eroding and depositional landform positions. By combining density fractionation with elemental and spectroscopic analyses, we showed that SOM in depositional settings is less transformed and better preserved than SOM in eroding landform positions. However, which environmental factors exert primary control on storage and persistence of SOM depended on the nature of the landform position considered. In an annual grassland watershed, protection of SOM by physical isolation inside aggregates and chemical association of organic matter (complexation) with soil minerals, as assessed by correlation with radiocarbon concentration, were more effective in the poorly drained, lowest‐lying depositional landform positions, compared to well‐drained landform positions in the upper parts of the watershed. Results of this study demonstrated that processes of soil erosion and deposition are important mechanisms of long‐term OM stabilization. Key Points Eroding and depositional landform positions vary in terms of soil carbon storage Mechanisms of SOM stabilization depend on nature of landform position considered Significant fraction of SOM in depositional positions can be easily mineralized
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd,American Geophysical Union
Subject
