Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Quantification of Blood Viscoelasticity under Microcapillary Blood Flow
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Quantification of Blood Viscoelasticity under Microcapillary Blood Flow
Do you wish to request the book?
Quantification of Blood Viscoelasticity under Microcapillary Blood Flow
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Quantification of Blood Viscoelasticity under Microcapillary Blood Flow
2023
Overview
Blood elasticity is quantified using a single compliance model by analyzing pulsatile blood flow. However, one compliance coefficient is influenced substantially by the microfluidic system (i.e., soft microfluidic channels and flexible tubing). The novelty of the present method comes from the assessment of two distinct compliance coefficients, one for the sample and one for the microfluidic system. With two compliance coefficients, the viscoelasticity measurement can be disentangled from the influence of the measurement device. In this study, a coflowing microfluidic channel was used to estimate blood viscoelasticity. Two compliance coefficients were suggested to denote the effects of the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) channel and flexible tubing (C1), as well as those of the RBC (red blood cell) elasticity (C2), in a microfluidic system. On the basis of the fluidic circuit modeling technique, a governing equation for the interface in the coflowing was derived, and its analytical solution was obtained by solving the second-order differential equation. Using the analytic solution, two compliance coefficients were obtained via a nonlinear curve fitting technique. According to the experimental results, C2/C1 is estimated to be approximately 10.9–20.4 with respect to channel depth (h = 4, 10, and 20 µm). The PDMS channel depth contributed simultaneously to the increase in the two compliance coefficients, whereas the outlet tubing caused a decrease in C1. The two compliance coefficients and blood viscosity varied substantially with respect to homogeneous hardened RBCs or heterogeneous hardened RBCs. In conclusion, the proposed method can be used to effectively detect changes in blood or microfluidic systems. In future studies, the present method can contribute to the detection of subpopulations of RBCs in the patient’s blood.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
Subject
