Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Investigating the dependence of mineral dust depolarization on complex refractive index and size with a laboratory polarimeter at 180.0° lidar backscattering angle
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Investigating the dependence of mineral dust depolarization on complex refractive index and size with a laboratory polarimeter at 180.0° lidar backscattering angle
Do you wish to request the book?
Investigating the dependence of mineral dust depolarization on complex refractive index and size with a laboratory polarimeter at 180.0° lidar backscattering angle
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Investigating the dependence of mineral dust depolarization on complex refractive index and size with a laboratory polarimeter at 180.0° lidar backscattering angle
2023
Overview
In this paper, the dependence of the particles' depolarization ratio (PDR) of mineral dust on the complex refractive index and size is for the first time investigated through a laboratory π-polarimeter operating at 180.0∘ backscattering angle and at (355, 532) nm wavelengths for lidar purposes. The dust PDR is indeed an important input parameter in polarization lidar experiments involving mineral dust. Our π-polarimeter provides 16 accurate (<1 %) values of the dust lidar PDR at 180.0∘ corresponding to four different complex refractive indices, studied at two size distributions (fine, coarse) ranging from 10 nm to more than 10 µm and at (355, 532) nm wavelengths while accounting for the highly irregular shape of mineral dust, which is difficult to model numerically. At 355 nm, the lidar PDR of coarser silica, the main oxide in mineral dust, is equal to (33±1) %, while that of coarser hematite, the main light absorbent in mineral dust, is (10±1) %. This huge difference is here explained by accounting for the high imaginary part of the hematite complex refractive index. In turn, Arizona dust exhibits higher depolarization than Asian dust, due to the higher proportion in hematite in the latter. As a result, when the strong light-absorbent hematite is involved, the dust lidar PDR primarily depends on the particles' complex refractive index, and its variations with size and shape are less pronounced. When hematite is less or not involved, the dust lidar PDR increases with increasing sizes, though the shape dependence may then also play a role. The (355, 532) nm wavelength dependence of the dust lidar PDR then allows discussing on the involved particle sizes, thus highlighting the importance of dual-wavelength (or more) polarization lidar instruments. We believe these laboratory findings will help improve our understanding of the challenging dependence of the dust lidar PDR with complex refractive index and size to help interpret the complexity and the wealth of polarization lidar signals.
