Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management
Do you wish to request the book?
Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management
2019
Overview
ObjectivesLung-RADS represents a categorical system published by the American College of Radiology to standardise management in lung cancer screening. The purpose of the study was to quantify how well readers agree in assigning Lung-RADS categories to screening CTs; secondary goals were to assess causes of disagreement and evaluate its impact on patient management.MethodsFor the observer study, 80 baseline and 80 follow-up scans were randomly selected from the NLST trial covering all Lung-RADS categories in an equal distribution. Agreement of seven observers was analysed using Cohen’s kappa statistics. Discrepancies were correlated with patient management, test performance and diagnosis of malignancy within the scan year.ResultsPairwise interobserver agreement was substantial (mean kappa 0.67, 95% CI 0.58–0.77). Lung-RADS category disagreement was seen in approximately one-third (29%, 971) of 3360 reading pairs, resulting in different patient management in 8% (278/3360). Out of the 91 reading pairs that referred to scans with a tumour diagnosis within 1 year, discrepancies in only two would have resulted in a substantial management change.ConclusionsAssignment of lung cancer screening CT scans to Lung-RADS categories achieves substantial interobserver agreement. Impact of disagreement on categorisation of malignant nodules was low.Key Points• Lung-RADS categorisation of low-dose lung screening CTs achieved substantial interobserver agreement.• Major cause for disagreement was assigning a different nodule as risk-dominant.• Disagreement led to a different follow-up time in 8% of reading pairs.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
