Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement
by
Saridogan, E
, Gerges, B
, Tomassetti, C
, van Herendael, B J
, Malzoni, M
, Thomassin-Naggara, I
, Becker, C
, Keckstein, J
, Hudelist, G
, Condous, G
, Krentel, H
, Abrao, M S
in
Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Endometriosis
/ Endoscopy
/ ESHRE Pages
/ Methods
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement
by
Saridogan, E
, Gerges, B
, Tomassetti, C
, van Herendael, B J
, Malzoni, M
, Thomassin-Naggara, I
, Becker, C
, Keckstein, J
, Hudelist, G
, Condous, G
, Krentel, H
, Abrao, M S
in
Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Endometriosis
/ Endoscopy
/ ESHRE Pages
/ Methods
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement
by
Saridogan, E
, Gerges, B
, Tomassetti, C
, van Herendael, B J
, Malzoni, M
, Thomassin-Naggara, I
, Becker, C
, Keckstein, J
, Hudelist, G
, Condous, G
, Krentel, H
, Abrao, M S
in
Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Endometriosis
/ Endoscopy
/ ESHRE Pages
/ Methods
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement
Journal Article
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.