MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T
Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T
Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T
Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T
Journal Article

Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
•ME-ICA and ICA-AROMA provide effective denoising for multi-echo 7T fMRI data.•High tSNR can be achieved in the brainstem with a multi-echo acquisition at 7T.•After ME-ICA, the data is best post-processed to correct for spatially diffuse noise.•ICA-AROMA-aggr might be too aggressive in denoising the multi-echo 7T fMRI data. In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain the measured signal is corrupted by several (e.g. physiological, motion, and thermal) noise sources and depends on the image acquisition. Imaging at ultrahigh field strength is becoming increasingly popular as it offers increased spatial accuracy. The latter is of particular benefit in brainstem neuroimaging given the small cross-sectional area of most nuclei. However, physiological noise scales with field strength in fMRI acquisitions. Although this problem is in part solved by decreasing voxel size, it is clear that adequate physiological denoising is of utmost importance in brainstem-focused fMRI experiments. Multi-echo sequences have been reported to facilitate highly effective denoising through TE-dependence of Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signals, in a denoising method referred to as multi-echo independent component analysis (ME-ICA). It has not been explored previously how ME-ICA compares to other data-driven denoising approaches at ultrahigh field strength. In the current study, we compared the efficacy of several denoising methods, including anatomical component based correction (aCompCor), Automatic Removal of Motion Artifacts (ICA-AROMA) aggressive and non-aggressive options, ME-ICA, and a combination of ME-ICA and aCompCor. We assessed several data quality metrics, including temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR), delta variation signal (DVARS), spectral density of the global signal, functional connectivity and Shannon spectral entropy. Moreover, we looked at the ability of each method to uncouple the global signal and respiration. In line with previous reports at lower field strengths, we demonstrate that after applying ME-ICA, the data is best post-processed in order to remove spatially diffuse noise with a method such as aCompCor. Our findings indicate that ME-ICA combined with aCompCor and the aggressive option of ICA-AROMA are highly effective denoising approaches for multi-echo data acquired at 7T. ME-ICA combined with aCompCor potentially preserves more signal-of-interest as compared to the aggressive option of ICA-AROMA.