Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Surgical evacuation of spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage: Comparison of safety and efficacy of suboccipital craniotomy and robotic-assisted stereotactic hematoma drainage
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Surgical evacuation of spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage: Comparison of safety and efficacy of suboccipital craniotomy and robotic-assisted stereotactic hematoma drainage
Do you wish to request the book?
Surgical evacuation of spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage: Comparison of safety and efficacy of suboccipital craniotomy and robotic-assisted stereotactic hematoma drainage
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Surgical evacuation of spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage: Comparison of safety and efficacy of suboccipital craniotomy and robotic-assisted stereotactic hematoma drainage
2024
Overview
This study compared the efficacies of robotic-assisted stereotactic hematoma drainage and suboccipital craniotomy (SC) in patients with spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage (SCH).
This retrospective study included 138 non-comatose patients with SCH (Glasgow Coma Scale score [GCS] >8), divided into the SC and Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) groups. The study recorded and analyzed complications and prognoses 90 days after ictus.
The inclusion criteria were met by 138 patients: 61 in the SC and 77 in the ROSA group, with no significant differences in sex, age, GCS score, hematoma volume, and the time from ictus to operation. The time of operation was greater in the SC group (287.53±87.57) than in the ROSA group (60.54±20.03). The evacuation rate (ER) was greater in the SC group (93.20±1.58) than in the ROSA group (89.13±2.75). The incidence of pneumonia and stress ulcers, as well as the length or costs of medical services, were lower in the ROSA group than in the SC group. Ninety days after ictus, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Glasgow Prognostic Scale (GOS), and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores significantly differed between the groups. The rate of good prognosis in the ROSA group was significantly higher compared with that in the SC group. The incidence of balance disorders was lower in the ROSA group than in the SC group; no statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of dysarthria and swallowing disorders.
Robotic-assisted stereotactic hematoma drainage may be suitable for non-comatose and stable condition patients with SCH. This procedure improves prognosis 90 days after ictus, lowers the incidence of pneumonia and stress ulcers, and reduces the length and costs of medical services.
•ROSA surgery may improve outcomes in non-comatose SCH patients.•This surgery reduces the length and costs of medical services.•Further, it is associated with a better prognosis compared to SC.
Publisher
Elsevier B.V,Elsevier Limited
