Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity
Do you wish to request the book?
Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity
2020
Overview
• Photosynthetic induction describes the transient increase in leaf CO₂ uptake with an increase in light. During induction, efficiency is lower than at steady state. Under field conditions of fluctuating light, this lower efficiency during induction may cost > 20% of potential crop assimilation. Accelerating induction would boost photosynthetic and resource-use efficiencies.
• Variation between rice accessions and potential for accelerating induction was analysed by gas exchange. Induction during shade to sun transitions of 14 accessions representing five subpopulations from the 3000 Rice Genome Project Panel (3K RGP) was analysed.
• Differences of 109% occurred in the CO₂ fixed during the first 300 s of induction, 117% in the half-time to completion of induction, and 65% in intrinsic water-use efficiency during induction, between the highest and lowest performing accessions. Induction in three accessions with contrasting responses (AUS 278, NCS 771 A and IR64-21) was compared for a range of [CO₂] to analyse limitations. This showed in vivo capacity for carboxylation at Rubisco (Vc,max), and not stomata, as the primary limitation to induction, with significant differences between accessions.
• Variation in nonsteady-state efficiency greatly exceeded that at steady state, suggesting a new and more promising opportunity for selection of greater crop photosynthetic efficiency in this key food crop.
Publisher
Wiley,Wiley Subscription Services, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subject
