Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Counterfactual Thinking About In-Group Versus Out-Group Others
by
Choi, Hyeman
, Choi, Hoon-Seok
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Do you wish to request the book?
Counterfactual Thinking About In-Group Versus Out-Group Others
by
Choi, Hyeman
, Choi, Hoon-Seok
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Counterfactual Thinking About In-Group Versus Out-Group Others
Journal Article
Counterfactual Thinking About In-Group Versus Out-Group Others
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The present research examined how the social category of a target (i.e., in-group versus out-group member) influences the nature of counterfactual thoughts people generate about the target. In Experiment 1, we found a marginally significant interaction effect such that participants generated more target-focused counterfactuals in response to a negative outcome that involved an in-group than an out-group target when the outcome was mildly negative, whereas this difference did not emerge when the outcome was severely negative. In Experiment 2, provision of an opportunity to affirm an important aspect of one’s self-concept allowed participants to generate more target-focused counterfactuals for an in-group than an out-group target, even when the outcome was severely negative. By contrast, participants in the non-affirmation condition did not show such a difference. Taken together, these results suggest that counterfactual thinking about others can be directed by self-related motives (i.e., self-preparative and self-protective motives) associated with the effects of social categorization and the severity of the negative outcome.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.