Journal Article

Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022

Ferrero, Alessandro, Di Benedetto, Fabrizio, Moraldi, Luca, Napoli, Niccolò, Romagnoli, Renato, Morelli, Luca, Garulli, Gianluca, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Falconi, Massimo, Jovine, Elio, Casadei, Riccardo, Dalla Valle, Raffaele, Belli, Giulio, Memeo, Riccardo, Salvia, Roberto, Zanus, Giacomo, Belli, Andrea, Molino, Carlo, Vivarelli, Marco, Borghi, Felice, Butturini, Giovanni, Coratti, Andrea, Coppola, Roberto, Esposito, Alessandro, Donisi, Greta, Brolese, Alberto, Ettorre, Giuseppe, Bracale, Umberto, Zerbi, Alessandro, Ferrari, Giovanni, Gruttadauria, Salvatore, Boggi, Ugo, Alfieri, Sergio, Ercolani, Giorgio, Partelli, Stefano, Troisi, Roberto, Viola, Massimo, Massani, Marco

2023

Overview

This retrospective analysis of the prospective IGOMIPS registry reports on 1191 minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) performed in Italy between 2019 and 2022, including 668 distal pancreatectomies (DP) (55.7%), 435 pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) (36.3%), 44 total pancreatectomies (3.7%), 36 tumor enucleations (3.0%), and 8 central pancreatectomies (0.7%). Spleen-preserving DP was performed in 109 patients (16.3%). Overall incidence of severe complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3) was 17.6% with a 90-day mortality of 1.9%. This registry analysis provided some important information. First, robotic assistance was preferred for all MIPR but DP with splenectomy. Second, robotic assistance reduced conversion to open surgery and blood loss in comparison to laparoscopy. Robotic PD was also associated with lower incidence of severe postoperative complications and a trend toward lower mortality. Fourth, the annual cut-off of ≥ 20 MIPR and ≥ 20 MIPD improved selected outcome measures. Fifth, most MIPR were performed by a single surgeon. Sixth, only two-thirds of the centers performed spleen-preserving DP. Seventh, DP with splenectomy was associated with higher conversion rate when compared to spleen-preserving DP. Eighth, the use of pancreatojejunostomy was the prevalent reconstruction in PD. Ninth, final histology was similar for MIPR performed at high- and low-volume centers, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used more frequently at high-volume centers. Finally, this registry analysis raises important concerns about the reliability of R1 assessment underscoring the importance of standardized pathology of pancreatic specimens. In conclusion, MIPR can be safely implemented on a national scale. Further analyses are required to understand nuances of implementation of MIPR in Italy.

• Publisher: Springer International Publishing,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Laparoscopy / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Original / Original Article / Pancreatectomy / Robotics / Software / Surgeons / Surgery