Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
How to assess Drosophila cold tolerance
by
MacMillan, Heath A.
, Manenti, Tommaso
, Overgaard, Johannes
, Sørensen, Jesper G.
, Loeschcke, Volker
, Andersen, Jonas L.
in
Animal models
/ Animal physiological ecology
/ animals
/ Cold
/ cold resistance
/ cold stress
/ Cold tolerance
/ Coma
/ Correlation analysis
/ Drosophila
/ geographic distribution
/ Geographical distribution
/ heat tolerance
/ insect
/ Insects
/ Low temperature
/ low temperature limit
/ Phylogeny
/ rearing
/ Recovery time
/ Regression analysis
/ stress tolerance
/ Supercooling
/ supercooling point
/ temperate zones
/ temperature
/ Temperature tolerance
/ Thermal stress
/ thermal tolerance
2015
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
How to assess Drosophila cold tolerance
by
MacMillan, Heath A.
, Manenti, Tommaso
, Overgaard, Johannes
, Sørensen, Jesper G.
, Loeschcke, Volker
, Andersen, Jonas L.
in
Animal models
/ Animal physiological ecology
/ animals
/ Cold
/ cold resistance
/ cold stress
/ Cold tolerance
/ Coma
/ Correlation analysis
/ Drosophila
/ geographic distribution
/ Geographical distribution
/ heat tolerance
/ insect
/ Insects
/ Low temperature
/ low temperature limit
/ Phylogeny
/ rearing
/ Recovery time
/ Regression analysis
/ stress tolerance
/ Supercooling
/ supercooling point
/ temperate zones
/ temperature
/ Temperature tolerance
/ Thermal stress
/ thermal tolerance
2015
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
How to assess Drosophila cold tolerance
by
MacMillan, Heath A.
, Manenti, Tommaso
, Overgaard, Johannes
, Sørensen, Jesper G.
, Loeschcke, Volker
, Andersen, Jonas L.
in
Animal models
/ Animal physiological ecology
/ animals
/ Cold
/ cold resistance
/ cold stress
/ Cold tolerance
/ Coma
/ Correlation analysis
/ Drosophila
/ geographic distribution
/ Geographical distribution
/ heat tolerance
/ insect
/ Insects
/ Low temperature
/ low temperature limit
/ Phylogeny
/ rearing
/ Recovery time
/ Regression analysis
/ stress tolerance
/ Supercooling
/ supercooling point
/ temperate zones
/ temperature
/ Temperature tolerance
/ Thermal stress
/ thermal tolerance
2015
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
How to assess Drosophila cold tolerance
2015
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Summary Thermal tolerance may limit and therefore predict ectotherm geographic distributions. However, which of the many metrics of thermal tolerance best predict distribution is often unclear, even for drosophilids, which constitute a popular and well‐described animal model. Five metrics of cold tolerance were measured for 14 Drosophila species to determine which metrics most strongly correlate with geographic distribution. The species represent tropical to temperate regions but all were reared under similar (common garden) conditions (20 °C). The traits measured were: chill coma temperature (CTmin), lethal temperature (LTe50), lethal time at low temperature (LTi50), chill coma recovery time (CCRT) and supercooling point (SCP). Measures of CTmin, LTe50 and LTi50 proved to be the best predictors to describe the variation in realized latitudinal distributions (R2 = 0·699, R2 = 0·741 and 0·550, respectively) and estimated environmental cold exposure (R2 = 0·633, R2 = 0·641 and 0·511, respectively). Measures of CCRT also correlated significantly with estimated minimum temperature (R2 = 0·373), while the SCP did not. These results remained consistent after phylogenetically independent analysis or when applying nonlinear regression. Moreover, our findings were supported by a similar analysis based on existing data compiled from the Drosophila cold tolerance literature. Trait correlations were strong between LTe50, LTi50 and CTmin, respectively (0·83 > R2 > 0·55). However, surprisingly, there was only a weak correlation between the entrance into coma (CTmin) and the recovery from chill coma (CCRT) (R2 = 0·256). Considering the findings of the present study, data from previous studies and the logistical constraints of each measure of cold tolerance, we conclude that CTmin and LTe50 are superior measures when estimating the ecologically relevant cold tolerance of drosophilids. Of these two traits, CTmin requires less equipment, time and animals and thereby presents a relatively fast, simple and dynamic measure of cold tolerance. Lay Summary
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.