Journal Article

Assessing nutrition and other claims on food labels: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian food supply

Franco-Arellano, Beatriz, Bernstein, Jodi T., Schermel, Alyssa, Norsen, Sheida, L’Abbé, Mary R.

2017

Overview

Background In 2010, nutrition claims were investigated in Canadian foods; however, many nutrition and other claims have been introduced since then. This study aimed to determine: i) the proportion of foods carrying claims in 2013, ii) the types and prevalence of nutrition claims (nutrient content claims, health claims, general health claims) and other claims displayed on labels in 2013, iii) and trends in use of nutrition claims between 2010 and 2013. Methods Repeated cross-sectional analysis of the University of Toronto Food Label Information Program (FLIP) of Canadian foods (2010/11 n  = 10,487; 2013 n  = 15,342). Regulated nutrition claims (nutrient content, health claims) were classified according to Canadian regulations. A decision tree was used to classify non-regulated general health claims (e.g., front-of-pack claims). Other claims (e.g., gluten-free) were also collected. Proportions of claims in 2013 were determined and χ 2 was used to test significant differences for different types of claims between 2010 and 2013. Results Overall, 49% of products in 2013 displayed any type of claim and 46% of foods in FLIP 2013 carried a nutrition claim (nutrient content claim, health claim, general health claim). Meal replacements and fruits/fruits juices were the categories with the largest proportion of foods with claims. At least one approved nutrient content claim was carried on 42.9% of products compared to 45.5% in 2010 ( p  < 0.001). Health claims, specifically disease risk reduction claims, were slightly lower in 2013 (1.5%) compared to 1.7% in 2010 ( p  = 0.225). General health claims, specifically front-of-pack claims, were carried on 20% of foods compared to 18.9% in 2010 ( p  = 0.020). Other claims, specifically gluten-free, were present on 7.3% of foods. Conclusions Nutrition and other claims were used on half of Canadian prepackaged foods in 2013. Many claims guidelines and regulations have been released since 2010; however, little impact has been seen in the prevalence of such claims in the food supply. Claims related to nutrients of public health priority, such as sugars and sodium, were not commonly used on food labels. Monitoring trends in the use of nutrition and other claims is essential to determine if their use on food labels reflects public health objectives, or instead are being used as marketing tools.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Canada / Cardiovascular disease / Cholesterol / Clinical Nutrition / Cross-sectional studies / Data collection / Decision trees / Descriptive labeling / Diet / Dietary minerals / Fatty acids / Food / Food labelling / Food products / Food supply / Gluten / Health care / Health Promotion and Disease Prevention / Marketing / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Night vision / Nutrition / Nutrition claims / Nutrition research / Nutritional interventions / policies and public health / Public Health / Quality / Research Article / Sodium / Software