Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Randomised evaluation of active control of temperature versus ordinary temperature management (REACTOR) trial
by
Frank M P van Haren
, Young, Paul J
, Bass, Frances
, Webb, Steve A R
, Mackle, Diane M
, Saxena, Manoj K
, Turner, Anne M
, Beasley, Richard W
, Henderson, Seton J
, McGuinness, Shay P
, McArthur, Colin J
, Myburgh, John A
, Bellomo, Rinaldo
, Bailey, Michael J
, Freebairn, Ross C
, Hammond, Naomi E
, Harward, Meg L
in
Active control
/ Body temperature
/ Clinical trials
/ Fever
/ Health services
/ Hospitals
/ Intensive care
/ Management
/ Patients
/ Randomization
/ Sepsis
/ Statistical analysis
/ Survival
/ Temperature effects
/ Temperature gradients
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Randomised evaluation of active control of temperature versus ordinary temperature management (REACTOR) trial
by
Frank M P van Haren
, Young, Paul J
, Bass, Frances
, Webb, Steve A R
, Mackle, Diane M
, Saxena, Manoj K
, Turner, Anne M
, Beasley, Richard W
, Henderson, Seton J
, McGuinness, Shay P
, McArthur, Colin J
, Myburgh, John A
, Bellomo, Rinaldo
, Bailey, Michael J
, Freebairn, Ross C
, Hammond, Naomi E
, Harward, Meg L
in
Active control
/ Body temperature
/ Clinical trials
/ Fever
/ Health services
/ Hospitals
/ Intensive care
/ Management
/ Patients
/ Randomization
/ Sepsis
/ Statistical analysis
/ Survival
/ Temperature effects
/ Temperature gradients
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Randomised evaluation of active control of temperature versus ordinary temperature management (REACTOR) trial
by
Frank M P van Haren
, Young, Paul J
, Bass, Frances
, Webb, Steve A R
, Mackle, Diane M
, Saxena, Manoj K
, Turner, Anne M
, Beasley, Richard W
, Henderson, Seton J
, McGuinness, Shay P
, McArthur, Colin J
, Myburgh, John A
, Bellomo, Rinaldo
, Bailey, Michael J
, Freebairn, Ross C
, Hammond, Naomi E
, Harward, Meg L
in
Active control
/ Body temperature
/ Clinical trials
/ Fever
/ Health services
/ Hospitals
/ Intensive care
/ Management
/ Patients
/ Randomization
/ Sepsis
/ Statistical analysis
/ Survival
/ Temperature effects
/ Temperature gradients
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Randomised evaluation of active control of temperature versus ordinary temperature management (REACTOR) trial
Journal Article
Randomised evaluation of active control of temperature versus ordinary temperature management (REACTOR) trial
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
PurposeIt is unknown whether protocols targeting systematic prevention and treatment of fever achieve lower mean body temperature than usual care in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The objective of the Randomised Evaluation of Active Control of temperature vs. ORdinary temperature management trial was to confirm the feasibility of such a protocol with a view to conducting a larger trial.MethodsWe randomly assigned 184 adults without acute brain pathologies who had a fever in the previous 12 h, and were expected to be ventilated beyond the calendar day after recruitment, to systematic prevention and treatment of fever or usual care. The primary outcome was mean body temperature in the ICU within 7 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU-free days and survival time censored at hospital discharge.ResultsCompared with usual temperature management, active management significantly reduced mean temperature. In both groups, fever generally abated within 72 h. The mean temperature difference between groups was greatest in the first 48 h, when it was generally in the order of 0.5 °C. Overall, 23 of 89 patients assigned to active management (25.8%) and 23 of 89 patients assigned to usual management (25.8%) died in hospital (odds ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.51–1.96, P = 1.0). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in ICU-free days or survival to day 90.ConclusionsActive temperature management reduced body temperature compared with usual care; however, fever abated rapidly, even in patients assigned to usual care, and the magnitude of temperature separation was small.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number, ACTRN12616001285448
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.