Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Physician experience with speech recognition software in psychiatry: usage and perspective
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Physician experience with speech recognition software in psychiatry: usage and perspective
Do you wish to request the book?
Physician experience with speech recognition software in psychiatry: usage and perspective
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Physician experience with speech recognition software in psychiatry: usage and perspective
2018
Overview
Objective
The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous study by evaluating the use of a speech recognition software in a clinical psychiatry milieu. Physicians (n = 55) at a psychiatric hospital participated in a limited implementation and were provided with training, licenses, and relevant devices. Post-implementation usage data was collected via the software. Additionally, a post-implementation survey was distributed 5 months after the technology was introduced.
Results
In the first month, 45 out of 51 (88%) physicians were active users of the technology; however, after the full evaluation period only 53% were still active. The average active user minutes and the average active user lines dictated per month remained consistent throughout the evaluation. The use of speech recognition software within a psychiatric setting is of value to some physicians. Our results indicate a post-implementation reduction in adoption, with stable usage for physicians who remained active users. Future studies to identify characteristics of users and/or technology that contribute to ongoing use would be of value.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
/ Analysis
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Ethics
/ Healthcare industry software
/ Hospitals, Psychiatric - statistics & numerical data
/ Humans
/ Licenses
/ Medical Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
/ Quality
/ Software
/ Speech
