Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Expanded HTA, Legitimacy and Independence Comment on \Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy\
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Expanded HTA, Legitimacy and Independence Comment on \Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy\
Do you wish to request the book?
Expanded HTA, Legitimacy and Independence Comment on \Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy\
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Expanded HTA, Legitimacy and Independence Comment on \Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy\
2016
Overview
This brief commentary seeks to develop the analysis of Daniels, Porteny and Urrutia of the implications of expansion of the scope of health technology assessment (HTA) beyond issues of safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Drawing in particular on experience in the United Kingdom, it suggests that such expansion can be understood not only as a response to the problem of insufficiency of evidence, but also to that of legitimacy. However, as expansion of HTA also renders it more visibly political in character, it is plausible that its legitimacy may be undermined, rather than enhanced by, independence from the policy process.
Publisher
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
