MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
Journal Article

Finite element analysis of four different fixation methods for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are severe injuries caused by high-energy trauma. In recent years, the incidence and discussion of such fractures have increased significantly. Research and literature on these fractures primarily consist of clinical retrospective analyses, meta-analyses, or case reports. Domestic and international studies have examined surgical timing, blood loss, complications, and healing duration across different treatment approaches for these fractures. Currently, no universally agreed-upon standard exists for managing such fractures in the literature. Objective Finite element analysis was performed to compare the biomechanical characteristics of four different types of fixations for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures (IFNSF), with the objective of determining the optimal choice of internal fixation. Method Femoral neck and shaft fracture models were simulated in conjunction with four fixation methods, including a femoral locking plate with a cannulated compression screw (plate + CCS), a retrograde nail with a cannulated compression screw (retrograde nail + CCS), a dual construct (InterTan), and a reconstruction nail. These models were assembled, and finite element analysis was conducted utilizing Ansys workbench. Results The peak von Mises stress for the femoral neck and internal fixation device was the lowest (219.91 MPa and 223.81 MPa, respectively) for the CCS and the highest (392.47 MPa and 388.32 MPa, respectively) for the reconstruction nail. For the A1-A3 type femoral shaft fractures, the peak von Mises stress was highest (102.54 MPa) for the reconstruction nail and lowest (88.554 MPa) for the retrograde nail. For the B2- and C2-type femoral shaft fractures, the peak von Mises stress was the highest (709.32 MPa) for the locking plate, whereas the lowest peak von Mises stress occurred for the retrograde nail (309.32 MPa). The elastic deformation of internal fixation was smallest (7.3365 mm) for the retrograde nail + CCS and largest (17.692 mm) for the plate + CCS. Conclusion In the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures, if the femoral shaft fracture is A1–A3, a retrograde nail with CCS or a femoral locking plate with CCS can achieve optimal mechanical stability. In complex femoral fractures (B2, C2), a retrograde nail with CCS results in superior mechanical stability.