Journal Article

Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams

Goater, Nicky, Ambler, Gareth, Onyett, Steve, Morant, Nicola, Lamb, Danielle, Kelly, Kathleen, Osborn, David, Gray, Richard, Paterson, Beth, Hindle, David, Mason, Oliver, Frerichs, Johanna, Sweeney, Angela, Bond, Gary R., Brown, Ellie, Fullarton, Kate, Fahmy, Sarah, Ruud, Torleif, Johnson, Sonia, Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor, Ivanecka, Ada, Henderson, Claire, Nolan, Fiona

2016

Overview

Background Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) provide short-term intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crisis. Trial evidence suggests CRTs can be effective at reducing hospital admissions and increasing satisfaction with acute care. When scaled up to national level however, CRT implementation and outcomes have been variable. We aimed to develop and test a fidelity scale to assess adherence to a model of best practice for CRTs, based on best available evidence. Methods A concept mapping process was used to develop a CRT fidelity scale. Participants ( n  = 68) from a range of stakeholder groups prioritised and grouped statements ( n  = 72) about important components of the CRT model, generated from a literature review, national survey and qualitative interviews. These data were analysed using Ariadne software and the resultant cluster solution informed item selection for a CRT fidelity scale. Operational criteria and scoring anchor points were developed for each item. The CORE CRT fidelity scale was then piloted in 75 CRTs in the UK to assess the range of scores achieved and feasibility for use in a 1-day fidelity review process. Trained reviewers ( n  = 16) rated CRT service fidelity in a vignette exercise to test the scale’s inter-rater reliability. Results There were high levels of agreement within and between stakeholder groups regarding the most important components of the CRT model. A 39-item measure of CRT model fidelity was developed. Piloting indicated that the scale was feasible for use to assess CRT model fidelity and had good face validity. The wide range of item scores and total scores across CRT services in the pilot demonstrate the measure can distinguish lower and higher fidelity services. Moderately good inter-rater reliability was found, with an estimated correlation between individual ratings of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.76). Conclusions The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale has been developed through a rigorous and systematic process. Promising initial testing indicates its value in assessing adherence to a model of CRT best practice and to support service improvement monitoring and planning. Further research is required to establish its psychometric properties and international applicability.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Best practices / Care and treatment / Concept mapping / Crisis intervention / Crisis Intervention - standards / Health services / Humans / Literature reviews / Medical personnel / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Mental Disorders - therapy / Mental Health / Mental health care / Mental Health Services - standards / Mental illness / Methods / Observations / Patient admissions / Psychiatric services / Psychiatry / Psychometrics / Psychotherapy / Qualitative research / Quality Indicators, Health Care / Quantitative psychology / Reproducibility of Results / Research Article / Services / Social psychiatry / Stakeholders / Surveys and Questionnaires - standards / Systematic review / therapy and provision of mental health care