Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Physical properties and hydration behavior of a fast-setting bioceramic endodontic material
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Physical properties and hydration behavior of a fast-setting bioceramic endodontic material
Do you wish to request the book?
Physical properties and hydration behavior of a fast-setting bioceramic endodontic material
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Physical properties and hydration behavior of a fast-setting bioceramic endodontic material
2016
Overview
Background
To investigate the physical properties and the hydration behaviour of the fast-setting bioceramic iRoot FS Fast Set Root Repair Material (iRoot FS) and three other endodontic cements.
Methods
iRoot FS, Endosequence Root Repair Material Putty (ERRM Putty), gray and white mineral trioxide aggregate (G-MTA & W-MTA), and intermediate restorative material (IRM) were evaluated. The setting time was measured using ANSI/ADA standards. Microhardness was evaluated using the Vickers indentation test. Compressive strength and porosity were investigated at 7 and 28 days. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was employed for the hydration test.
Results
iRoot FS had the shortest setting time of the four bioceramic cements (
p
< .001). The microhardness values of iRoot FS, ERRM Putty and MTA increased at different rates over the 28 days period. At day one, ERRM Putty had the lowest microhardness of the bioceramic cements (
p
< .001), but reached the same level as MTA at 4, 7 and 28 days. The microhardness of iRoot FS was lower than that of W-MTA at 7 and 28 days (
p
< .05). The porosity of the materials did not change after 7 days (
p
< .05). The compressive strength values at 28 days were significantly greater for all bioceramic groups compared to those at 7 days (
p
< .01). ERRM Putty had the highest compressive strength and the lowest porosity of the evaluated bioceramic cements (
p
< .05), followed by iRoot FS, W-MTA, and G-MTA, respectively. DSC showed that iRoot FS hydrated fastest, inducing an intense exothermic reaction. The ERRM Putty did not demonstrate a clear exothermic peak during the isothermal calorimetry test.
Conclusions
iRoot FS had a faster setting time and hydrating process than the other bioceramic cements tested. The mechanical properties of iRoot FS, G-MTA and W-MTA were relatively similar.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V
