Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Social network analysis of key stakeholders in Brucellosis prevention in Western Iran
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Social network analysis of key stakeholders in Brucellosis prevention in Western Iran
Do you wish to request the book?
Social network analysis of key stakeholders in Brucellosis prevention in Western Iran
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Social network analysis of key stakeholders in Brucellosis prevention in Western Iran
2025
Overview
Background
Brucellosis remains a persistent public health challenge in Iran, particularly in rural regions such as Lorestan province, due to systemic, economic, and cultural barriers. Effective disease control requires multisectoral collaboration among stakeholders. This study aimed to map the stakeholder network involved in brucellosis prevention in Lorestan province, identify gaps in coordination, and provide actionable recommendations for improving control strategies.
Methods
This cross-sectional study employed social network analysis (SNA) to explore the relationships among key stakeholders in brucellosis prevention. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to 75 experts from various sectors, including health, veterinary, agriculture, and non-governmental organizations. The SNA evaluated network density, clustering coefficient, and centrality metrics to determine the levels of collaboration and influence among stakeholders.
Results
The analysis revealed a moderately dense network (density: 0.2745; clustering coefficient: 0.2839) with central roles played by the Veterinary Organization of Lorestan Province, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, and the Ministry of Agriculture. These organizations exhibited high levels of influence, support, and interest in brucellosis prevention. However, limited involvement of community-based organizations and environmental agencies was identified, highlighting a critical gap in grassroots engagement. Fragmented coordination was particularly evident in rural areas, where traditional livestock practices, inadequate veterinary services, and the consumption of unpasteurized dairy products perpetuate disease transmission. Economic constraints, such as the high cost of vaccines, along with limited public awareness, further hinder effective control efforts.
Conclusions
Brucellosis prevention in Lorestan province requires a comprehensive, multisectoral approach. The adoption of a One Health framework can improve collaboration among stakeholders, enhance resource allocation, and address systemic barriers. Community engagement and intersectoral coordination are essential for improving public awareness and compliance with preventive measures. These findings provide a foundation for developing a National Brucellosis Control Program and inform strategies to mitigate zoonotic diseases in similar high-risk regions.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BMC
Subject
