Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Disparities in the use of assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: a population-based study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Disparities in the use of assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: a population-based study
Do you wish to request the book?
Disparities in the use of assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: a population-based study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Disparities in the use of assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: a population-based study
2023
Overview
PurposeEquitable access to oncofertility services is a key component of cancer survivorship care, but factors affecting access and use remain understudied. MethodsTo describe disparities in assisted reproductive technology (ART) use among women with breast cancer in California, we conducted a population-based cohort study using linked oncology, ART, and demographic data. We identified women age 18–45 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2000 and 2015. The primary outcome was ART use—including oocyte/embryo cryopreservation or embryo transfer—after cancer diagnosis. We used log-binomial regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify factors associated with ART use. ResultsAmong 36,468 women with invasive breast cancer, 206 (0.56%) used ART. Women significantly less likely to use ART were age 36–45 years at diagnosis (vs. 18–35 years: PR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.13–0.22); non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic White: PR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.21–0.46); had at least one child (vs. no children: adjusted PR [aPR] = 0.39, 95% CI 0.25–0.60); or lived in non-urban areas (vs. urban: aPR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.10–0.75), whereas women more likely to use ART lived in high-SES areas (vs. low-/middle-SES areas: aPR = 2.93, 95% CI 2.04–4.20) or had private insurance (vs. public/other insurance: aPR = 2.95, 95% CI 1.59–5.49).ConclusionWomen with breast cancer who are socially or economically disadvantaged, or who already had a child, are substantially less likely to use ART after diagnosis. The implementation of policies or programs targeting more equitable access to fertility services for women with cancer is warranted.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
