Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Do you wish to request the book?
Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
2015
Overview
Background
Mental health policy is for staff to transform their practice towards a recovery orientation. Staff understanding of recovery-orientated practice will influence the implementation of this policy. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of empirical studies identifying clinician and manager conceptualisations of recovery-orientated practice.
Methods
A systematic review of empirical primary research was conducted. Data sources were online databases (
n
= 8), journal table of contents (
n
= 5), internet, expert consultation (
n
= 13), reference lists of included studies and references to included studies. Narrative synthesis was used to integrate the findings.
Results
A total of 10,125 studies were screened, 245 full papers were retrieved, and 22 were included (participants,
n
= 1163). The following three conceptualisations of recovery-orientated practice were identified: clinical recovery, personal recovery and service-defined recovery. Service-defined recovery is a new conceptualisation which translates recovery into practice according to the goals and financial needs of the organisation.
Conclusions
Organisational priorities influence staff understanding of recovery support. This influence is leading to the emergence of an additional meaning of recovery. The impact of service-led approaches to operationalising recovery-orientated practice has not been evaluated.
Trial Registration
The protocol for the review was pre-registered (PROSPERO 2013:
CRD42013005942
).
Publisher
BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V
