Journal Article

Behavioural Change Techniques in Health Coaching-Based Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Caton, Samantha J., Norman, Paul, Goyder, Elizabeth, Almulhim, Abdullah N., Hartley, Hannah, Doğru, Onur Cem

2023

Overview

Background Given the high rates globally of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), there is a clear need to target health behaviours through person-centred interventions. Health coaching is one strategy that has been widely recognised as a tool to foster positive behaviour change. However, it has been used inconsistently and has produced mixed results. This systematic review sought to explore the use of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) in health coaching interventions and identify which BCTs are linked with increased effectiveness in relation to HbA1C reductions. Methods In line with the PICO framework, the review focused on people with T2DM, who received health coaching and were compared with a usual care or active control group on HbA1c levels. Studies were systematically identified through different databases including Medline, Web of science, and PsycINFO searches for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in papers published between January 1950 and April 2022. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Included papers were screened on the reported use of BCTs based on the BCT taxonomy. The effect sizes obtained in included interventions were assessed by using Cohen’s d and meta-analysis was used to estimate sample-weighted average effect sizes (Hedges’ g). Results Twenty RCTs with a total sample size of 3222 were identified. Random effects meta-analysis estimated a small-sized statistically significant effect of health coaching interventions on HbA1c reduction ( g +  = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.40). A clinically significant HbA1c decrease of ≥5 mmol/mol was seen in eight studies. Twenty-three unique BCTs were identified in the reported interventions, with a mean of 4.5 (SD = 2.4) BCTs used in each study. Of these, Goal setting (behaviour) and Problem solving were the most frequently identified BCTs. The number of BCTs used was not related to intervention effectiveness. In addition, there was little evidence to link the use of specific BCTs to larger reductions in HbA1c across the studies included in the review; instead, the use of Credible source and Social reward in interventions were associated with smaller reductions in HbA1c. Conclusion A relatively small number of BCTs have been used in RCTs of health coaching interventions for T2DM. Inadequate, imprecise descriptions of interventions and the lack of theory were the main limitations of the studies included in this review. Moreover, other possible BCTs directly related to the theoretical underpinnings of health coaching were absent. It is recommended that key BCTs are identified at an early stage of intervention development, although further research is needed to examine the most effective BCTs to use in health coaching interventions. Trial registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021228567 .

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
• Subject: Behavior modification / Behavior Therapy - methods / Behaviour change techniques / Biostatistics / Care and treatment / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - therapy / Environmental Health / Epidemiology / Evaluation / Glycated Hemoglobin / Health aspects / Health behaviour change / Health coaching / Health Promotion / Humans / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Mentoring / Public Health / Self-management / Type 2 diabetes / Vaccine