MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort
Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort
Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort
Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort
Journal Article

Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background We investigated sensitivity of the 2020 Revised Comprehensive Diagnostic Criteria (RCD) and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across the four identified IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) phenotypes: “Pancreato-Hepato-Biliary”, “Retroperitoneum and Aorta”, “Head and Neck-limited” and “Mikulicz’ and Systemic” in a well-characterized patient cohort. Methods We included adult patients diagnosed with IgG4-RD after comprehensive clinical assessment at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. We assigned patients to IgG4-RD phenotypes based on pattern of organ involvement and assessed fulfillment of RCD and 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Differences between phenotype groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA for continuous variables, and contingency tables for categorical variables. Results The study cohort included 79 IgG4-RD patients assigned to the “Pancreato-Hepato-Biliary” (22.8%), Retroperitoneum and Aorta” (22.8%) “Head and Neck-limited” (29.1%), and “Mikulicz’ and Systemic” (25.3%) phenotype groups, respectively. While 72/79 (91.1%) patients in total fulfilled the RCD, proportion differed across phenotype groups and was lowest in the “Retroperitoneum and Aorta” group (66.7%, p  < 0.001). Among the 57 (72.2%) patients meeting the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, proportion was again lowest in the “Retroperitoneum and Aorta” group (27.8%, p  < 0.001). Conclusion The results from this study indicate that IgG4-RD patients having the “Retroperitoneum and Aorta” phenotype less often fulfill diagnostic criteria and classification criteria than patients with other IgG4-RD phenotypes. Accordingly, this phenotype is at risk of being systematically selected against in observational studies and randomized clinical trials, with potential implications for patients, caregivers and future definitions of IgG4-RD.