Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Metabolomics of related C3 and C4 Flaveria species indicate differences in the operation of photorespiration under fluctuating light
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Metabolomics of related C3 and C4 Flaveria species indicate differences in the operation of photorespiration under fluctuating light
Do you wish to request the book?
Metabolomics of related C3 and C4 Flaveria species indicate differences in the operation of photorespiration under fluctuating light
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Metabolomics of related C3 and C4 Flaveria species indicate differences in the operation of photorespiration under fluctuating light
2024
Overview
C3 photosynthesis can be complemented with a C4 carbon concentrating mechanism (CCM) to minimize photorespiratory losses. C4 photosynthesis is often more efficient than C3 under steady‐state conditions. However, the C4 CCM depends on inter‐cellular metabolite concentration gradients, which must increase following increases in light intensity and could decrease rates of C4 photosynthesis under fluctuating light. Additionally, incomplete flux through photorespiration could prove beneficial to C4 assimilation during light induction of the CCM. Here, we compare metabolic profiles in the closely related C3 Flaveria robusta and C4 Flaveria bidentis during a light transient from low to high light to determine if these non‐steady state accumulation patterns provide insight to the induction of the metabolite gradients needed to drive C4 intermediate transport and if there is incomplete cycling of photorespiratory intermediates. In these C3 and C4 species, metabolite steady‐state pool sizes suggest that C4 transport acids maintain concentration gradients across the bundle sheath and mesophyll cell types under these light fluctuations. However, there was incomplete flux through photorespiration in the C4 F. bidentis, which could reduce photorespiratory CO2 loss via glycine decarboxylation and help maintain higher rates of assimilation during following induction periods.
