MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care
Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care
Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care
Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care
Journal Article

Learning to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies: a pilot study comparing three teaching strategies for junior doctors in intensive care

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background In intensive care settings, doctors face low-frequency and high-stakes events such as tracheostomy-related emergencies. Junior doctors must learn to manage these situations to ensure patient safety, yet they often lack clinical exposure to such critical events. Clinical teachers should develop methods that provide enough learning opportunities while remaining feasible in terms of workload. This study compared three strategies for teaching junior doctors to manage tracheostomy-related emergencies in intensive care unit (ICU). Method In this pilot study, conducted in the ICU of Lausanne University Hospital, twenty-four junior doctors were randomized into three groups: Group A: Access to a printed algorithm; Group B: E-learning, including the algorithm with access to a toolbox; Group C: Flipped classroom course, including a short low-fidelity simulation. Performance was assessed through pre- and post-intervention sessions consisting of three tracheostomy-related simulation scenarios. A modified Delphi method was used to develop a performance assessment tool consisting of an evaluation scale for each scenario. Knowledge was also assessed before and after the intervention through a multiple-choice questionnaire. The primary outcome was the Global Performance Score (GPS), calculated for each teaching method by summing the performance scale scores across the three simulation scenarios as the total score across all scenarios, after the intervention. Results The GPS significantly improved after the intervention in the three groups (Group A: M  = 141, SD  = 22 vs. M  = 116, SD  = 16.7 p  = 0.008; Group B: M  = 157, SD  = 14 vs. M  = 110.1, SD  = 17.3 p  = 0.008; Group C: M  = 171.9, SD  = 20.1 vs. M  = 99.4, SD  = 16 p  = 0.008). There was a trend for a higher post-intervention GPS in Group B as compared to Group A ( p  = 0.105), and in Group C as compared to Group B ( p  = 0.279). By contrast, post-intervention GPS was significantly higher in Group C as compared to Group A ( p  = 0.021). Conclusion The flipped classroom strategy, combined with a brief simulation, yielded the highest post-intervention score. This strategy appears promising for junior doctors learning to manage low-frequency critical events, such as tracheostomy-related emergencies. Further research should explore its feasibility at larger scale, confirm the results in a larger population of learners with adequately powered studies and the applicability of such a teaching approach to other critical events.