Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Tibiofemoral Subluxation on Radiograph as a Predictor of Location and Size of Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Tibiofemoral Subluxation on Radiograph as a Predictor of Location and Size of Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee
Do you wish to request the book?
Tibiofemoral Subluxation on Radiograph as a Predictor of Location and Size of Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Tibiofemoral Subluxation on Radiograph as a Predictor of Location and Size of Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee
2024
Overview
Background:
Lower limb malalignment has been associated with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD). However, the location of the OCD lesion often is not concordant with the mechanical leg axis. Other potentially modifiable alignment parameters may influence the propensity for impingement of the femoral condyles.
Purpose:
To assess differences in lower limb alignment (LLA) and relative tibiofemoral position between patients with medial (MFC-OCD) or lateral OCD (LFC-OCD) of the femoral condyle.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Patients ≤30 years old who were diagnosed with unicondylar OCD between January 2010 and January 2020 were eligible for this study. Included were 55 patients (age, 20.8 ± 4.5 years)—46 with MFC-OCD and 9 with LFC-OCD. Preoperative standing long-leg radiographs were studied to obtain primary outcomes—including LLA and mechanical alignment analyses—and secondary outcomes—including knee joint obliquity angle; rotation angle; medial, central (c-subluxation), and lateral subluxation (L-subluxation) of the tibia relative to the femur in the coronal plane; and tibiofemoral joint line center distance (TFJCD).
Results:
With regard to primary outcomes, LLA was significantly different between MFC-OCD (1.7°± 3.1° varus) and LFC-OCD (2.7 ± 3.1° valgus) (P < .001), and 78% (36/46) of patients with MFC-OCD had varus alignment, whereas 78% (7/9) of patients with LFC-OCD had valgus alignment (P < 0.002). With regard to secondary outcomes, patients with MFC-OCD had a more medial tibial position in relation to the femur, with a significantly smaller rotation angle (5.6°± 2.4° vs 9.6°± 3.6°; P < .001), a smaller C-subluxation (7.2 ± 6.6 vs 14.9 ± 8.8 mm; P < .01), a smaller L-subluxation (2.3 ± 2.6 vs 4.4 ± 2.7 mm; P < .05), and reduced TFJCD (3.5 ± 1.7 vs 6.6 ± 1.8 mm; P < .001) compared with the LFC-OCD group. For patients with MFC-OCD, the size of the OCD was significantly correlated with C-subluxation (r = 0.412; P = .006).
Conclusion:
LLA was significantly different according to OCD location. In patients with MFC-OCD, the tibia was subluxated medially, resulting in a change of joint geometry by approximation of the medial tibial eminence toward the medial femoral condyle, potentially causing excessive pressure overload and microtrauma of the cartilage. Interestingly, the extent of subluxation was correlated with OCD size.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
