Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available
by
Campbell, M. J.
, McElduff, P.
, Barker, D.
, D’Este, C.
in
Clinical trials
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Cluster randomised
/ Data analysis
/ Data Interpretation, Statistical
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Intervention
/ Management
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Methods
/ Models, Statistical
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Research Article
/ Statistical methodology
/ Statistical Theory and Methods
/ statistics and modelling
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Stepped wedge
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Variance analysis
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available
by
Campbell, M. J.
, McElduff, P.
, Barker, D.
, D’Este, C.
in
Clinical trials
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Cluster randomised
/ Data analysis
/ Data Interpretation, Statistical
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Intervention
/ Management
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Methods
/ Models, Statistical
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Research Article
/ Statistical methodology
/ Statistical Theory and Methods
/ statistics and modelling
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Stepped wedge
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Variance analysis
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available
by
Campbell, M. J.
, McElduff, P.
, Barker, D.
, D’Este, C.
in
Clinical trials
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Cluster randomised
/ Data analysis
/ Data Interpretation, Statistical
/ Health Sciences
/ Humans
/ Intervention
/ Management
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Methods
/ Models, Statistical
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Research Article
/ Statistical methodology
/ Statistical Theory and Methods
/ statistics and modelling
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Stepped wedge
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Variance analysis
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available
Journal Article
Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Previous reviews have focussed on the rationale for employing the stepped wedge design (SWD), the areas of research to which the design has been applied and the general characteristics of the design. However these did not focus on the statistical methods nor addressed the appropriateness of sample size methods used.This was a review of the literature of the statistical methodology used in stepped wedge cluster randomised trials.
Methods
Literature Review. The Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched for methodological guides and RCTs which employed the stepped wedge design.
Results
This review identified 102 trials which employed the stepped wedge design compared to 37 from the most recent review by Beard et al. 2015. Forty six trials were cohort designs and 45 % (
n
= 46) had fewer than 10 clusters. Of the 42 articles discussing the design methodology 10 covered analysis and seven covered sample size. For cohort stepped wedge designs there was only one paper considering analysis and one considering sample size methods. Most trials employed either a GEE or mixed model approach to analysis (
n
= 77) but only 22 trials (22 %) estimated sample size in a way which accounted for the stepped wedge design that was subsequently used.
Conclusions
Many studies which employ the stepped wedge design have few clusters but use methods of analysis which may require more clusters for unbiased and efficient intervention effect estimates. There is the need for research on the minimum number of clusters required for both types of stepped wedge design. Researchers should distinguish in the sample size calculation between cohort and cross sectional stepped wedge designs. Further research is needed on the effect of adjusting for the potential confounding of time on the study power.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.