Journal Article

“Currently flying blind” Stakeholders’ perceptions of implementing statewide population-based cancer staging at diagnosis into the Western Australian Cancer Registry: a rapid qualitative process evaluation of the WA Cancer Staging Project

Trevithick, Richard W., Pung, Li, Moorin, Rachael, Smith, Stephanie, Ha, Ninh, Chai, Kevin E. K., Gewerc, Cristiana Garcia, Taylor, Karen, Smith, James

2023

Overview

Background Cancer stage at diagnosis is essential for understanding cancer outcomes, guiding cancer control activities and healthcare services, and enabling benchmarking nationally and internationally. Yet, most cancer registries in Australia do not routinely collect this data. This study explored key stakeholders’ perceptions of implementing cancer staging utilising Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning algorithms within the Western Australian Cancer Registry. Methods Perceptions of key breast and colorectal cancer stakeholders, including registry staff, clinicians, consumers, data scientists, biostatisticians, data management, healthcare staff, and health researchers, were collected. Prospective and retrospective qualitative proformas at two-time points of the Western Australian Cancer Staging Project were employed. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide data collection, analysis and interpretation embedded in a Participatory Action Research approach. Data analysis also incorporated Framework Analysis and an adapted version of grading qualitative data using a visual traffic light labelling system to highlight the levels of positivity, negativity, and implementation concern. Results Twenty-nine pre-proformas and 18 post-proformas were completed online via REDCap. The grading and visual presentation of barriers and enablers aided interpretation and reviewing predicted intervention outcomes. Of the selected constructs, complexity (the perceived difficulty of the intervention) was the strongest barrier and tension for change (the situation needing change) was the strongest enabler. Implementing cancer staging into the Western Australian Cancer Registry was considered vital. Benefits included improved knowledge and understanding of various outcomes (e.g., treatment received as per Optimum Care Pathways) and benchmarking. Barriers included compatibility issues with current systems/workflows, departmental/higher managerial support, and future sustainment. Conclusions The findings aid further review of data gaps, additional cancer streams, standardising cancer staging and future improvements. The study offers an adapted version of a rapid qualitative data collection and analytic approach for establishing barriers and enablers. The findings may also assist other population-based cancer registries considering collecting cancer stage at diagnosis.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Algorithms / Australia - epidemiology / Cancer patients / Cancer registry / Cancer staging at diagnosis / Care and treatment / Colorectal cancer / Computational linguistics / Data collection / Data Management / Health Administration / Health aspects / Health Informatics / Health planning / Health services / Humans / Intervention / Language processing / Machine learning / Medical diagnosis / Medical screening / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Natural language interfaces / Neoplasm Staging / Neoplasms - diagnosis / Neoplasms - epidemiology / Neoplasms - therapy / Nursing Research / Population / Population-based cancer staging / Process evaluation / Prospective Studies / Public Health / Qualitative / Registries / Retrospective Studies / Tumor staging