Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Raters and examinees training for objective structured clinical examination: comparing the effectiveness of three instructional methodologies
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Raters and examinees training for objective structured clinical examination: comparing the effectiveness of three instructional methodologies
Do you wish to request the book?
Raters and examinees training for objective structured clinical examination: comparing the effectiveness of three instructional methodologies
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Raters and examinees training for objective structured clinical examination: comparing the effectiveness of three instructional methodologies
2024
Overview
Background
Utilizing the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) ensures objectivity when it comes to the assessment of nursing students’ skills and competency. However, one challenge in OSCE integration is rater and examinee training and orientation.
Aim
This study employed a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the effectiveness of different instructional methodologies in training and preparing raters and examinees for the OSCE.
Methods
Participants were divided into three group of training methodologies: online, simulation, and traditional lecture (six raters and 18 examinees were assigned to each group). A total of 18 raters and 54 examinees partook.
Results
The study found that raters trained through simulation exhibited a slight agreement with their rates, compared to those who were trained online and in traditional lectures. Moreover, examinees who were trained through the simulation methodology performed better compared to those trained via the other methodologies.
Conclusions
The study findings indicate that using simulation by training raters and examinees in the OSCE is the most effective approach.
