Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A scoping review of ethical decisions and decision tools for experimental animal protocols
by
Shaw, David
, Gaab, Jens
, Geneviève, Lester Darryl
, Elger, Bernice Simone
, Azilagbetor, David Mawufemor
, Morales, Rosa Maria Cajiga
in
Animal ethics committees
/ Animal experimentation
/ Animal Experimentation - ethics
/ Animal Welfare - ethics
/ Animals
/ Decision Making - ethics
/ Decision Support Techniques
/ Decision support tools
/ Decision-making
/ Education
/ Ethical aspects
/ Ethics
/ Ethics, Research
/ Harm-benefit analysis
/ Humans
/ IACUCs
/ Methods
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Systematic Review
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Weighing of interests
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A scoping review of ethical decisions and decision tools for experimental animal protocols
by
Shaw, David
, Gaab, Jens
, Geneviève, Lester Darryl
, Elger, Bernice Simone
, Azilagbetor, David Mawufemor
, Morales, Rosa Maria Cajiga
in
Animal ethics committees
/ Animal experimentation
/ Animal Experimentation - ethics
/ Animal Welfare - ethics
/ Animals
/ Decision Making - ethics
/ Decision Support Techniques
/ Decision support tools
/ Decision-making
/ Education
/ Ethical aspects
/ Ethics
/ Ethics, Research
/ Harm-benefit analysis
/ Humans
/ IACUCs
/ Methods
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Systematic Review
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Weighing of interests
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A scoping review of ethical decisions and decision tools for experimental animal protocols
by
Shaw, David
, Gaab, Jens
, Geneviève, Lester Darryl
, Elger, Bernice Simone
, Azilagbetor, David Mawufemor
, Morales, Rosa Maria Cajiga
in
Animal ethics committees
/ Animal experimentation
/ Animal Experimentation - ethics
/ Animal Welfare - ethics
/ Animals
/ Decision Making - ethics
/ Decision Support Techniques
/ Decision support tools
/ Decision-making
/ Education
/ Ethical aspects
/ Ethics
/ Ethics, Research
/ Harm-benefit analysis
/ Humans
/ IACUCs
/ Methods
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Systematic Review
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Weighing of interests
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A scoping review of ethical decisions and decision tools for experimental animal protocols
Journal Article
A scoping review of ethical decisions and decision tools for experimental animal protocols
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Scientific research projects involving animals are required to undergo ethical evaluation, generally known as
harm-benefit analysis (HBA)
, to ensure that they address important ethical concerns related to animal welfare and the scientific quality of the research to maximize the likelihood of their potential benefits. Research continuously shows the challenges encountered by decision-makers, prompting researchers to review how HBA is conducted and to propose tools to aid decision-making. However, the extent to which such resources are currently available, their jurisdictions of applicability, and how they guide decision-making are not entirely clear.
Method
Through a Scoping Review methodology, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for publications in Europe and North America (USA and Canada) from 1985 to 2023. Title and abstract, full-text, and reference screenings, followed by data charting, respectively, were carried out for retrieved publications using pre-developed and registered review protocol.
Results
17 resources that can guide HBA and decision-making were identified. They discussed what should constitute harm to animals and benefits of research, and how these two interests can be balanced to make a decision. Some adopt mathematical calculations, some propose guidelines for committee discussions, while others propose the combination of different approaches to decision-making.
Conclusions
Decision-making based on deliberation among committee members should be supported over the use of scoring approaches. Additionally, making ethical decisions on a case-by-case basis is preferable to accuracy, which may not be realistically practicable.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.