MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review
Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review
Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review
Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review
Journal Article

Global variations in diagnostic methods and epidemiological estimates in Pompe disease: findings from a scoping review

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Pompe disease is caused by pathogenic variants in the GAA gene, resulting in lysosomal acid α-glucosidase (GAA) deficiency. The prevalence of Pompe disease is not well-defined, and estimates vary by geographic region. We evaluated the global epidemiology of Pompe disease and the potential reasons for differing prevalence estimates using published data from worldwide newborn screening (NBS) programs and population-based studies. Methods A comprehensive literature search in PubMed was conducted in July 2023, updated in March 2024, and validated with an Embase search in June 2024. Search terms included Pompe disease, GSDII, prevalence, incidence, epidemiology, survival, mortality, and NBS. Studies were included based on robust epidemiological methods, the presence of disease definition, and publication within the past 5 years. We identified 1210 abstracts, of which 295 met recency criteria, 30 were deemed relevant, and 11 met all inclusion criteria. Results Prevalence estimates and GAA enzyme activity cutoff values varied across geographic regions. In NBS studies, the birth prevalence of infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD) ranged from 1 in 297,387 in Japan to 1 in 62,186 in Taiwan, and late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) ranged from 1 in 82,914 in Taiwan to 1 in 17,133 in Pennsylvania. Data from the French National Pompe Registry (N = 246) showed an increase in diagnosis of LOPD from 2.6/year before 2001 to 10.6/year during 2001–2010 and 12.8/year during 2011–2015. Enzyme cutoffs in dried blood spots varied from < 3% of lymphocyte mean to 2.10 μmol/L/h to ≤ 18% of the daily median. Three studies noted higher prevalence in populations of African descent, and two noted a higher frequency of pseudodeficiency alleles in Asian populations. Conclusions This scoping review confirmed that prevalence estimates differ for IOPD and LOPD and vary by geographic region, potentially by race and ethnicity. It highlights the need to standardize screening and diagnosis methods, genetic testing protocols, and uniform disease classification between IOPD and LOPD.